[PATCH 4/4] pinctrl: qcom: Add support for reset for apq8064
From: Pramod Gurav <hidden>
Date: 2014-08-29 13:34:13
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, lkml
Hi Bjorn, On 29-08-2014 06:58 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Thu 28 Aug 20:22 PDT 2014, Pramod Gurav wrote:quoted
This patch adds support for reset functions to reboot the boards with soc apq8064. CC: Linus Walleij <redacted> CC: Bjorn Andersson <redacted> CC: "Ivan T. Ivanov" <redacted> CC: Stephen Boyd <redacted> CC: Andy Gross <redacted> Signed-off-by: Pramod Gurav <redacted> --- drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-apq8064.c | 7 +++++- drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-apq8064.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-apq8064.c index feb6f15..ef1263c 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-apq8064.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-apq8064.c@@ -324,6 +324,7 @@ enum apq8064_functions { APQ_MUX_tsif1, APQ_MUX_tsif2, APQ_MUX_usb2_hsic, + APQ_MUX_ps_hold, APQ_MUX_NA, };@@ -351,6 +352,9 @@ static const char * const gpio_groups[] = { "gpio78", "gpio79", "gpio80", "gpio81", "gpio82", "gpio83", "gpio84", "gpio85", "gpio86", "gpio87", "gpio88", "gpio89" }; +static const char * const ps_hold_groups[] = { + "gpio78" +}; static const char * const gsbi1_groups[] = { "gpio18", "gpio19", "gpio20", "gpio21" };@@ -477,6 +481,7 @@ static const struct msm_function apq8064_functions[] = { FUNCTION(tsif1), FUNCTION(tsif2), FUNCTION(usb2_hsic), + FUNCTION(ps_hold), }; static const struct msm_pingroup apq8064_groups[] = {@@ -558,7 +563,7 @@ static const struct msm_pingroup apq8064_groups[] = { PINGROUP(75, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA), PINGROUP(76, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA), PINGROUP(77, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA), - PINGROUP(78, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA), + PINGROUP(78, ps_hold, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA), PINGROUP(79, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA), PINGROUP(80, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA), PINGROUP(81, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA),diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c index 2738108..be43e7a 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ * GNU General Public License for more details. */ +#include <linux/delay.h> #include <linux/err.h> #include <linux/io.h> #include <linux/module.h>@@ -27,12 +28,17 @@ #include <linux/interrupt.h> #include <linux/spinlock.h> +#include <asm/system_misc.h> + #include "../core.h" #include "../pinconf.h" #include "pinctrl-msm.h" #include "../pinctrl-utils.h" #define MAX_NR_GPIO 300 +#define PS_HOLD_OFFSET 0x820 + +static void __iomem *msm_ps_hold; /** * struct msm_pinctrl - state for a pinctrl-msm device@@ -848,10 +854,31 @@ static int msm_gpio_init(struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl) return 0; } +static void qcom_reset(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd)This doesn't follow the naming used in this.quoted
+{ + writel(0, msm_ps_hold); + mdelay(10000);Why 10 seconds? What happens after that?
This I copied from existing msm-poweroff.c driver for apq8074. Not sure why such a long delay. I will exclude this from mine as I have no valid reason.
quoted
+} + +const struct msm_function +*find_pshold_function(const struct msm_function *functions, + unsigned nfunctions, const char *name)This should be static. But that would cause a compile warning on non-ARM platforms, see below.quoted
+{ + int i = 0; + const struct msm_function *func; + + for (func = functions; i <= nfunctions; func++, i++)Why do you have 'func' and why do you iterate over that and i? for (i = 0; i < nfunctions; i++) if (strcmp(functions[i]->name, name) == 0) return true; (or &functions[i] if you really need it) But as you only uses this once I would prefer if you just merge in the setting of msm_ps_hold and arm_pm_restart here as well, see below.quoted
+ if (!strcmp(func->name, name)) + return func; + + return NULL; +} + int msm_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev, const struct msm_pinctrl_soc_data *soc_data) { struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl; + const struct msm_function *func; struct resource *res; int ret;@@ -871,6 +898,17 @@ int msm_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev, if (IS_ERR(pctrl->regs)) return PTR_ERR(pctrl->regs); +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM + func = find_pshold_function(soc_data->functions, + soc_data->nfunctions, "ps_hold"); + if (func) { + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Found Function %s\n", func->name);Guess what, it will print "ps_hold" here. I would prefer if you just skip this line, as this will always be true on 8960 and 8064.quoted
+ msm_ps_hold = pctrl->regs + PS_HOLD_OFFSET; + arm_pm_restart = qcom_reset; + } +#else +#error "not supported on this arch"There is no reason for you to break compilation of this driver on non-ARM platforms. This #else/#error should be removed. I would prefer if you did not #ifdef at all within the function, but rather merge this piece of logic with the search above into a static function that's surrounded by a check for CONFIG_ARM - providing a no-op for non-arm boards. I.e #ifdef CONFIG_ARM static void qcom_reset(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd) { ... } static void msm_pinctrl_setup_pm_reset(pctrl) { ... } #else static void msm_pinctrl_setup_pm_reset(pctrl) {} #endif
Will put this in a single function which takes pctrl and address you comments there in v3. Thanks for review. :-)
quoted
+#endifRegards, Bjorn