On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 04:00:28PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 21:00:12 +0800, Hanjun Guo [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
@@ -345,13 +378,19 @@ int __init psci_init(void)
const struct of_device_id *matched_np;
psci_initcall_t init_fn;
- np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, psci_of_match, &matched_np);
+ if (acpi_disabled) {
+ np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL,
+ psci_of_match, &matched_np);
- if (!np)
- return -ENODEV;
+ if (!np)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ init_fn = (psci_initcall_t)matched_np->data;
+
+ return init_fn(np);
+ }
- init_fn = (psci_initcall_t)matched_np->data;
- return init_fn(np);
+ return psci_0_2_init_acpi();
}
So, while the functionality is sound, this is kind of a stinky diff. The
ACPI path should not push the OF code into a sub branch. Make it look
like this instead (with the advantage that the diff will be simpler):
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI) && !acpi_disabled)
+ return psci_0_2_init_acpi();
Minor point: we should define acpi_disabled to 1 when !CONFIG_ACPI and
avoid additional IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI) checks (unless already don this
way).
--
Catalin