[PATCH 2/5] arm64, thunder: Add initial dts for Cavium Thunder SoC
From: rric@kernel.org (Robert Richter)
Date: 2014-08-05 08:47:26
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
On 30.07.14 18:48:03, Mark Rutland wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
+ uaa0: serial at 87e024000000 { + compatible = "arm,pl011", "arm,primecell"; + reg = <0x87e0 0x24000000 0x0 0x1000>; + interrupts = <1 21 4>; + clocks = <&refclk50mhz>; + clock-names = "apb_pclk";Is this actually the apb_pclk, or is the the uartclk? I assume it's the latter.Shouldn't new bindings have both clocks here? A single clock was a mistake I think (mine in fact).I don't think we fixed it up in the end. It made drivers look a bit messy and it dropped off my priority queue.
On 31.07.14 10:22:19, Rob Herring wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Robert Richter [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 30.07.14 11:37:38, Rob Herring wrote:quoted
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Mark Rutland [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 04:06:31PM +0100, Robert Richter wrote:quoted
From: Radha Mohan Chintakuntla <redacted> + uaa0: serial at 87e024000000 { + compatible = "arm,pl011", "arm,primecell"; + reg = <0x87e0 0x24000000 0x0 0x1000>; + interrupts = <1 21 4>; + clocks = <&refclk50mhz>; + clock-names = "apb_pclk";Is this actually the apb_pclk, or is the the uartclk? I assume it's the latter.Shouldn't new bindings have both clocks here? A single clock was a mistake I think (mine in fact).Do you mean clock-names = "uartclk", "apb_pclk"; here?Yes, but Mark said this change never happened so maybe it is fine. In any case, follow the pl011 binding documentation.
Right:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/primecell.txt:
- clocks : From common clock binding. First clock is phandle to clock for apb
pclk. Additional clocks are optional and specific to those peripherals.
- clock-names : From common clock binding. Shall be "apb_pclk" for first clock.
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/pl011.txt
- clocks: When present, must refer to exactly one clock named
"apb_pclk"
There is no binding documentation at all for "uartclk".
It seems we should should leave clock-names = "apb_pclk" as it is.
Mark, Rob, would this be ok?
Thanks,
-Robert