Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2014-08-05

[PATCH 2/5] arm64, thunder: Add initial dts for Cavium Thunder SoC

From: rric@kernel.org (Robert Richter)
Date: 2014-08-05 08:47:26
Also in: linux-devicetree, lkml

On 30.07.14 18:48:03, Mark Rutland wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
+             uaa0: serial at 87e024000000 {
+                     compatible = "arm,pl011", "arm,primecell";
+                     reg = <0x87e0 0x24000000 0x0 0x1000>;
+                     interrupts = <1 21 4>;
+                     clocks = <&refclk50mhz>;
+                     clock-names = "apb_pclk";
Is this actually the apb_pclk, or is the the uartclk? I assume it's the
latter.
Shouldn't new bindings have both clocks here? A single clock was a
mistake I think (mine in fact).
I don't think we fixed it up in the end. It made drivers look a bit messy and
it dropped off my priority queue.
On 31.07.14 10:22:19, Rob Herring wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Robert Richter [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 30.07.14 11:37:38, Rob Herring wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Mark Rutland [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 04:06:31PM +0100, Robert Richter wrote:
quoted
From: Radha Mohan Chintakuntla <redacted>
+             uaa0: serial at 87e024000000 {
+                     compatible = "arm,pl011", "arm,primecell";
+                     reg = <0x87e0 0x24000000 0x0 0x1000>;
+                     interrupts = <1 21 4>;
+                     clocks = <&refclk50mhz>;
+                     clock-names = "apb_pclk";
Is this actually the apb_pclk, or is the the uartclk? I assume it's the
latter.
Shouldn't new bindings have both clocks here? A single clock was a
mistake I think (mine in fact).
Do you mean
                        clock-names = "uartclk", "apb_pclk";
here?
Yes, but Mark said this change never happened so maybe it is fine. In
any case, follow the pl011 binding documentation.
Right:

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/primecell.txt:
- clocks : From common clock binding. First clock is phandle to clock for apb
        pclk. Additional clocks are optional and specific to those peripherals.
- clock-names : From common clock binding. Shall be "apb_pclk" for first clock.

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/pl011.txt
- clocks:  When present, must refer to exactly one clock named
           "apb_pclk"

There is no binding documentation at all for "uartclk".

It seems we should should leave clock-names = "apb_pclk" as it is.

Mark, Rob, would this be ok?

Thanks,

-Robert
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help