[PATCH v3 1/4] mfd: pm8xxx-spmi: add support for Qualcomm SPMI PMICs
From: Stanimir Varbanov <hidden>
Date: 2014-08-01 08:31:34
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-devicetree, lkml
On 07/31/2014 11:48 AM, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
Hi David, Thanks for the comments! On 07/30/2014 12:54 AM, David Collins wrote:quoted
On 07/24/2014 05:45 AM, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:quoted
From: Josh Cartwright <redacted> The Qualcomm SPMI PMIC chips are components used with the Snapdragon 800 series SoC family. This driver exists largely as a glue mfd component, it exists to be an owner of an SPMI regmap for children devices described in device tree. Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <redacted> Signed-off-by: Stanimir Varbanov <redacted> Acked-by: Lee Jones <redacted> --- drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 16 +++++++++++ drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 + drivers/mfd/pm8xxx-spmi.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++Would it be possible to rename this driver: qcom-spmi-pmic.c? The driver will be supporting several PMICs that do not fit the pm8xxx naming scheme. One of which is even specified in the compatible list of this driver (pma8084). There is presently downstream support for the following PMICs: PM8019, PM8110, PM8226, PM8841, PM8916, PM8941, PM8994, PMA8084, PMD9635, PMI8962, and PMI8994 [1]. Four of these do not fit the "PM8XXX" template.I haven't strong opinion on the file names. The qcom prefix is the one which annoying me. If you look at /drivers/mfd the company name prefixes are very few. The *compatible* strings are the important thing here. So If MFD maintainer is fine with this name I'm fine too.
Lee, are you OK with suggested names qcom-spmi-pmic and qcom-ssbi-pmic? -- regards, Stan