On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:48:53PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:

On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 08:35:09PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

quoted

Applied.  Please send patches against current code, I needed to hand
apply this.

By current do you mean asoc-next? That would not be very easy, since
i'm patching a large number of subsystems here. I don't think the
gpio, or the libata, or the led maintainer would be too happy if i
based the patches on asoc-next! So i picked a plain -rcX kernel,
something neutral to everybody.

Right, for something like this where the changes are supposed to be
applied in the individual trees rather than merged in -next can be a
reasonable basis.  It's not ideal (and it's pretty unusual for it to
make any sense) but it'll mostly ensure that the patches can be picked
up with relative ease.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140730/af982549/attachment.sig>