[PATCH v5 00/14] Clock support for rk3066,rk3188 and rk3288

Hi Olof,

Am Sonntag, 13. Juli 2014, 20:12:07 schrieb Olof Johansson:

Hi,

On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Mike Turquette [off-list ref] 

wrote:

quoted

Quoting Heiko St?bner (2014-07-02 16:53:24)

quoted

This series adds a clock driver infrastructure for Rockchip SoCs in
general and clock-definitions for the RK3188 and RK3288 in particular.

Apart from the arch/arm patches included here, there are some more
in the waiting line, like adding the i2c nodes and possibly the pwm, i2s
and spi nodes if the relevant drivers get accepted, where the ids
defined in the dt-binding headers are needed.

So if the whole thing is acceptable could we either offer a branch
from the clk-tree that can get merged or take the whole series through
the arm tree?

Heiko,

This version looks good. I've pushed a branch with all 14 of these
patches based on 3.16-rc3 to the clk tree. See:

git://git.linaro.org/people/mike.turquette/linux.git clk-rockchip

If everyone is OK to merge that stable branch then I will merge
clk-rockchip into clk-next and we're all good. If the arm-soc guys want
to carve it up a bit further or handle it in a different way then we can
do that. I've Cc'd arm-soc for clarification.

Traditionally we usually take the DT changes through arm-soc, but as
long as we share the branch we might be ok. We tend to stick them in
different branches in our tree though, so rockchip will be a little
mis-sorted this release. Not a big deal, and we can deal with it.

So, I'll leave it to Heiko to choose here, he knows best what other DT
changes are coming this release. If he wants to carry the DT changes
separately, then patches 1-10 would be for the clk tree, so it should
be easy to reset the branch back a bit (and 11-14 would be for
arm-soc).

hmm, there are essentially two changeset/branches upcoming:
- the collected dts changes for rk3066 and rk3188 I posted saturday
  These essentially extend patches 12-14
- rk3288 support which would start off patch 11 (the reset controller)

So if we were to separate the series I would say patches 1-11 in the shared 
branch and patch 12-14 as the first ones for a rk3066/rk3188 specific branch.


Heiko