Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2014-07-30

[PATCH 2/2] clk: initial clock driver for TWL6030

From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown)
Date: 2014-07-30 17:50:33
Also in: linux-devicetree

On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 04:02:29PM +0200, Stefan Assmann wrote:
+static int twl6030_clk32kg_is_prepared(struct clk_hw *hw)
+{
+	struct twl6030_desc *desc = to_twl6030_desc(hw);
+
+	return desc->enabled;
+}
Why not just check the register map - can't the register be cached?  If
that's not possible a comment would be good.
+static int of_twl6030_clk32kg_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
+	struct clk *clk;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	if (!node)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	clk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, "clk32kg");
devm_clk_get()?
+	if (IS_ERR(clk))
+		ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
Shouldn't the provided return code be being used?
+	else
+		clk_prepare(clk);
Why is the clock driver defaulting to enabling the clock, and if it
needs to shouldn't it be doing a prepere_enable() even if the enable
happens not to do anything to the hardware?  Otherwise child clocks
might get confused.

The return value is also not being checked.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140730/ed6a6771/attachment.sig>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help