[PATCH 6/6] ARM: dts: add rk3288 evaluation board
From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko Stübner)
Date: 2014-07-16 21:22:21
Also in:
linux-devicetree
Am Mittwoch, 16. Juli 2014, 13:02:53 schrieb Doug Anderson:
Heiko, On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Heiko St?bner [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-evb-rk808.dtsb/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-evb-rk808.dts new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c168cb2--- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-evb-rk808.dts@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +/* + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or + * (at your option) any later version. + * + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the + * GNU General Public License for more details. + */ + +/dts-v1/; +#include "rk3288-evb.dtsi" + +/ { + compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-evb-rk808", "rockchip,rk3288"; +nit: remove extra blank line?quoted
+};diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-evb.dtsib/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-evb.dtsi new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ff642d4--- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-evb.dtsi@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ +/* + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or + * (at your option) any later version. + * + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the + * GNU General Public License for more details. + */ + +#include "rk3288.dtsi" + +/ { + aliases { + serial0 = &uart0; + serial1 = &uart1; + serial2 = &uart2; + serial3 = &uart3; + serial4 = &uart4;Can the aliases go in the main dtsi?quoted
+ }; + + memory { + reg = <0x0 0x80000000>; + }; + + soc { + gpio-keys { + compatible = "gpio-keys"; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + autorepeat;I would have expected pinctrl for gpio0-5 to make sure pulls are enabled / disabled as appropriate.quoted
+ + button at 0 { + gpios = <&gpio0 5 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; + linux,code = <116>; + label = "GPIO Key Power"; + linux,input-type = <1>; + gpio-key,wakeup = <1>; + debounce-interval = <100>; + }; + }; + + i2c0: i2c at ff650000 { + pinctrl-names = "default"; + pinctrl-0 = <&i2c0_xfer>; + status = "okay"; + }; + + watchdog at ff800000 { + status = "okay"; + }; + + serial at ff180000 { + status = "okay"; + }; + + serial at ff190000 { + status = "okay"; + }; + + uart2: serial at ff690000 { + pinctrl-names = "default"; + pinctrl-0 = <&uart2_xfer>;Why is this pinctrl here?
The other uarts also have rts/cts pins available, but optional it seems. So my idea was to let the boards decide which pins to use, instead of setting it in the soc-dtsi. Other opinions? :-)
quoted
+ status = "okay"; + };