[PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: topology: Use a clock if possible to get the CPU frequency
From: Maxime Ripard <hidden>
Date: 2014-07-08 07:39:40
Also in:
linux-devicetree
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 11:22:33AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
quoted
quoted
I still think that using the current rate with clk_get_rate is not a good solution.Well, it's just as good as using clock-frequency, really. If you want the CPU max frequency, it's not the right property (plus, since the changed behaviour is not documented in Linux anywhere, the only reference we have is the ePAPR on this).quoted
Could you give us more details about why you nee to use current clock ?Honestly, I just want to remove that big warning at boot on the A7-based SoCs we have :)so Why not changing the log message ? It's clearly not an error to not have clock-frequency
Because the next SoCs we're going to support will be HMP, so we're only delaying the issue by a few month if we're doing so. It doesn't fix the underlying issue where you're using a standard property for a (slightly) different usage. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140708/32eb41b8/attachment.sig>