[PATCH v3] Documentation: devicetree: Fix tps65090 typos in example
From: javier@dowhile0.org (Javier Martinez Canillas)
Date: 2014-07-31 23:51:17
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-samsung-soc, lkml
Hello Andreas, On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Andreas F?rber [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Specification and existing device trees use vsys-l{1,2}-supply, not vsys_l{1,2}-supply. Fix the example to match the specification. Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Fixes: 21d2202158e9 ("mfd: tps65090: add DT support for tps65090") Signed-off-by: Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de> --- v2 -> v3: * Added Fixes header * + regulator and mfd maintainers v1 -> v2: * More verbose commit message (requested by Mark Rutland) Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt index 340980239ea9..ca69f5e3040c 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt@@ -45,8 +45,8 @@ Example: infet5-supply = <&some_reg>; infet6-supply = <&some_reg>; infet7-supply = <&some_reg>; - vsys_l1-supply = <&some_reg>; - vsys_l2-supply = <&some_reg>; + vsys-l1-supply = <&some_reg>; + vsys-l2-supply = <&some_reg>;
True, these also matches the .supply_name used when registering the LDO[1-2] regulators in the tps65090 driver. So clearly the example was wrong while the property specification is correct. Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <redacted> Best regards, Javier