[PATCH 0/3] ARM: EXYNOS: Fix Exynos5410 boot
From: afaerber@suse.de (Andreas Färber)
Date: 2014-07-31 03:59:12
Also in:
linux-samsung-soc, lkml
Hi Kukjin, Am 31.07.2014 03:10, schrieb Kukjin Kim:
Olof Johansson wrote:quoted
Hi,Hi Olof,quoted
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Kukjin Kim [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Andreas F?rber wrote:quoted
Am 27.07.2014 14:22, schrieb Andreas F?rber:quoted
Hello, This mini-series unbreaks booting on 5410 based ODROID-XU. Since I do not have access to a TRM, the address is a guess based on 5250 and 5410. Such a node was not present in the 3.14 downstream tree.s/5410/5420/OK.quoted
quoted
Regards, Andreas Andreas F?rber (3): Documentation: devicetree: Document exynos5410 PMU ARM: dts: exynos: Add PMU to Exynos5410 ARM: EXYNOS: Add support for Exynos5410 PMU Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt | 1 + arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410.dtsi | 5 +++++ arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 1 + 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+)Andreas, thanks. I'll apply this whole series.We're getting close to the merge window. I'd prefer not to have to start reverting samsung code to recover from these regressions, so please send this up very soon.Thanks for your gentle reminder. BTW I'm waiting for exynos5250-spring support from Andreas and I'd like to get confirmation about that from Doug. And I'm looking at s2r related patches now. OK, I will send out current samsung tree tonight in my time anyway.
That would be kind. Patches 2-3 in spring v3 should be non-functional snow refactorings for you to consider, but untested by me; patch 1 you could skip if you modify patch 2, if necessary. As for patch 4, you can see from my spring-next branch [1] how I am successfully testing it with a TEST_ONLY patch: For simplefb usage I comment out the /dp-controller node to avoid drm/exynos detection (not enabling the driver in the user's .config would be an alternative); when I run into issues with the drm during testing, I can usually ssh in via USB ethernet/wifi. In the dmesg for drm/exynos bridge series testing [2] (which I guess is not gonna hit 3.17 any more?) I noticed that the USB3503 /usb-hub node new in v3 is not working yet (complains about lack of #gpio-cells, I guess for my reset-gpios property), not sure how to fix, so we/you could probably just drop that node - preparing to test that now. As for the rest of patch 4, it's a new DT, so we could fix up any remaining bugs during 3.17 RC cycle, if it looks sane to you guys now. I had replied to two series - namely cpufreq [3] and dwmmc [4] - where merge conflicts might arise. Let me know if you need a respin for anything. Regards, Andreas [1] https://github.com/afaerber/linux/commits/spring-next [2] http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org/msg34927.html [3] http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org/msg34807.html [4] http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org/msg34898.html -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend?rffer; HRB 16746 AG N?rnberg