Am 2014-07-16 08:43, schrieb Stefan Agner:

Am 2014-07-15 16:24, schrieb Marc Kleine-Budde:
<snip>

quoted

quoted

@@ -150,18 +171,20 @@
  * FLEXCAN hardware feature flags
  *
  * Below is some version info we got:
- *    SOC   Version   IP-Version  Glitch-  [TR]WRN_INT
- *                                Filter?   connected?
- *   MX25  FlexCAN2  03.00.00.00     no         no
- *   MX28  FlexCAN2  03.00.04.00    yes        yes
- *   MX35  FlexCAN2  03.00.00.00     no         no
- *   MX53  FlexCAN2  03.00.00.00    yes         no
- *   MX6s  FlexCAN3  10.00.12.00    yes        yes
+ *    SOC   Version   IP-Version  Glitch-  [TR]WRN_INT  Memory err
+ *                                Filter?   connected?  detection
+ *   MX25  FlexCAN2  03.00.00.00     no         no         no
+ *   MX28  FlexCAN2  03.00.04.00    yes        yes         no
+ *   MX35  FlexCAN2  03.00.00.00     no         no         no
+ *   MX53  FlexCAN2  03.00.00.00    yes         no         no
+ *   MX6s  FlexCAN3  10.00.12.00    yes        yes         no
+ *   VF610 FlexCAN3  ?               no         no        yes

                                        ^^         ^^

Can you check the datasheet if the flexcan core has a "Glitch Filter
Width Register (FLEXCANx_GFWR)"

There is no such register called GFWR/Glitch Filter or similar.

quoted

Can you check if the core generates a warning interrupt with the current
setup, if you don't switch on bus error reporting? This means internally
the [TR]WRN_INT is connected and works as specified.

Ok, so I disabled TWRNMSK (Bit 11) in the control register and printed
out the error and status register (ESR1), this is what I get:
[  191.285295] flexcan_irq, esr=00040080
[  191.288996] flexcan_irq, ctrl=17092051

Bit 17 (TWRNINT) is not set while TWRNMSK is disabled. Hence [TR]WRN_INT
is not connected?

Ping. Anything open/to do from my side?

--
Stefan