[PATCH v6 4/5] PCI: add PCI controller for keystone PCIe h/w

On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] wrote:

On Friday 18 July 2014 14:31:39 Rob Herring wrote:

quoted

quoted

+
+ Example:
+       pcie_msi_intc: msi-interrupt-controller {
+                       interrupt-controller;
+                       #interrupt-cells = <1>;
+                       interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
+                       interrupts = <GIC_SPI 30 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+                                       <GIC_SPI 31 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+                                       <GIC_SPI 32 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+                                       <GIC_SPI 33 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+                                       <GIC_SPI 34 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+                                       <GIC_SPI 35 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+                                       <GIC_SPI 36 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+                                       <GIC_SPI 37 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+       };
+
+pcie_intc: Interrupt controller device node for Legacy irq chip
+       interrupt-cells: should be set to 1
+       interrupt-parent: Parent interrupt controller phandle
+       interrupts: GIC interrupt lines connected to PCI Legacy interrupt lines
+
+ Example:
+       pcie_intc: legacy-interrupt-controller {
+               interrupt-controller;
+               #interrupt-cells = <1>;
+               interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
+               interrupts = <GIC_SPI 26 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+                       <GIC_SPI 27 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+                       <GIC_SPI 28 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+                       <GIC_SPI 29 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+       };

This seems wrong. Legacy interrupts should be described with
interrupt-map and then PCI child devices have a standard interrupt
specifier.

I'm not sure about MSIs, but I would think they would have a standard
format too.

IIRC, it's actually the correct way to do this here: the problem is that
the PCI IRQs are not directly connected to the GIC, but instead there is
a nested irqchip that has each PCI IRQ routed to it and that requires
an extra EOI for each interrupt.

The interrupt-map in the PCI host points to this special irqchip rather
than to the GIC.

Okay, if there is still an interrupt-map property, then I agree. This
wasn't clear in the example.

Rob