[PATCHv2 2/5] mailbox/omap: add support for parsing dt devices
From: Markus Mayer <hidden>
Date: 2014-07-16 20:50:17
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-omap, lkml
If I may nit-pick here for a minute... On 11 July 2014 15:04, Suman Anna [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Logic has been added to the OMAP2+ mailbox code to parse the mailbox dt nodes and construct the different sub-mailboxes associated with the instance. The DT representation of the sub-mailbox devices is different from legacy platform data representation to allow flexibility of interrupt configuration between Tx and Rx fifos (to also possibly allow simplex devices in the future). The DT representation gathers similar information that was being passed previously through the platform data, except for the number of fifos, interrupts and interrupt type information, which are gathered through driver compatible match data. The non-DT support has to be maintained for now to not break OMAP3 legacy boot, and the legacy-style code will be cleaned up once OMAP3 is also converted to DT-boot only. Cc: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <redacted> --- drivers/mailbox/omap-mailbox.c | 156 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 132 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/omap-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/omap-mailbox.c
[...]
static int omap_mbox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct resource *mem;
int ret;
struct omap_mbox **list, *mbox, *mboxblk;
struct omap_mbox_pdata *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
- struct omap_mbox_dev_info *info;
+ struct omap_mbox_dev_info *info = NULL;
+ struct omap_mbox_fifo_info *finfo, *finfoblk;
struct omap_mbox_device *mdev;
struct omap_mbox_fifo *fifo;
- u32 intr_type;
+ struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
+ struct device_node *child;
+ const struct of_device_id *match;
+ u32 intr_type, info_count;
+ u32 num_users, num_fifos;
+ u32 tmp[3];
u32 l;
int i;
- if (!pdata || !pdata->info_cnt || !pdata->info) {
+ if (!node && (!pdata || !pdata->info_cnt || !pdata->info)) {
pr_err("%s: platform not supported\n", __func__);
return -ENODEV;
}
+ if (node) {
I noticed here you are using
if (node)
/* DT stuff goes here */
else
/* non-DT stuff goes here */
but below the logic is reversed.
+ match = of_match_device(omap_mailbox_of_match, &pdev->dev);
+ if (!match)
+ return -ENODEV;
+ intr_type = (u32)match->data;
+
+ if (of_property_read_u32(node, "ti,mbox-num-users",
+ &num_users))
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ if (of_property_read_u32(node, "ti,mbox-num-fifos",
+ &num_fifos))
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ info_count = of_get_available_child_count(node);
+ if (!info_count) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no available mbox devices found\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+ } else { /* non-DT device creation */
+ info_count = pdata->info_cnt;
+ info = pdata->info;
+ intr_type = pdata->intr_type;
+ num_users = pdata->num_users;
+ num_fifos = pdata->num_fifos;
+ }
+
+ finfoblk = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, info_count * sizeof(*finfoblk),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!finfoblk)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ finfo = finfoblk;
+ child = NULL;
+ for (i = 0; i < info_count; i++, finfo++) {
+ if (!node) {
Here it's
if (!node)
/* non-DT stuff */
else
/* DT stuff */
I think the "if (node) ..." version is a bit cleaner. Besides it's
nice if code is consistent. Do you mind changing the if statement here
so it matches the logic used above?
+ finfo->tx_id = info->tx_id;
+ finfo->rx_id = info->rx_id;
+ finfo->tx_usr = info->usr_id;
+ finfo->tx_irq = info->irq_id;
+ finfo->rx_usr = info->usr_id;
+ finfo->rx_irq = info->irq_id;
+ finfo->name = info->name;
+ info++;
+ } else {
+ child = of_get_next_available_child(node, child);
+ ret = of_property_read_u32_array(child, "ti,mbox-tx",
+ tmp, ARRAY_SIZE(tmp));
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ finfo->tx_id = tmp[0];
+ finfo->tx_irq = tmp[1];
+ finfo->tx_usr = tmp[2];
+
+ ret = of_property_read_u32_array(child, "ti,mbox-rx",
+ tmp, ARRAY_SIZE(tmp));
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ finfo->rx_id = tmp[0];
+ finfo->rx_irq = tmp[1];
+ finfo->rx_usr = tmp[2];
+
+ finfo->name = child->name;
+ }
+ if (finfo->tx_id >= num_fifos || finfo->rx_id >= num_fifos ||
+ finfo->tx_usr >= num_users || finfo->rx_usr >= num_users)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+