On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 04:01:14PM +0100, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 07/14/2014 07:55 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
quoted
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 04:30:26PM +0100, Guenter Roeck wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
index 43b7c34..b2da6d5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
@@ -174,6 +174,8 @@ void machine_restart(char *cmd)
/* Now call the architecture specific reboot code. */
if (arm_pm_restart)
arm_pm_restart(reboot_mode, cmd);
+ else
+ kernel_restart_notify(cmd);
There are couple of drivers specific to arm64, once they are converted
we can get rid of arm_pm_restart entirely here.
I thought you wanted to keep exporting arm_pm_restart.
No, I just thought you don't want the restart mechanism implemented in
modules but the notifier registration still allows that, so I didn't
fully get the reasoning. But I agree on the race aspect.
That logically implies
that you want to have the ability to write new drivers which use it, which
in turn implies that converting existing drivers would not make much sense.
If the new handler registration mechanism gives the functionality, I
don't see why we should keep arm_pm_restart around (for arm64 it's
easier since there aren't many drivers setting it).
--
Catalin