[PATCH v8 2/9] pci: Export find_pci_host_bridge() function.
From: Liviu.Dudau@arm.com (Liviu Dudau)
Date: 2014-07-08 10:42:56
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-pci, lkml
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 12:27:49AM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 07:43:27PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:quoted
This is a useful function and we should make it visible outside the generic PCI code. Export it as a GPL symbol. Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Tested-by: Tanmay Inamdar <redacted> --- drivers/pci/host-bridge.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/drivers/pci/host-bridge.c b/drivers/pci/host-bridge.c index 0e5f3c9..36c669e 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/host-bridge.c +++ b/drivers/pci/host-bridge.c@@ -16,12 +16,13 @@ static struct pci_bus *find_pci_root_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) return bus; } -static struct pci_host_bridge *find_pci_host_bridge(struct pci_bus *bus) +struct pci_host_bridge *find_pci_host_bridge(struct pci_bus *bus) { struct pci_bus *root_bus = find_pci_root_bus(bus); return to_pci_host_bridge(root_bus->bridge); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(find_pci_host_bridge);There's nothing in this series that uses find_pci_host_bridge(), so how about we just wait until we have something that needs it? Also, if/when we export this, I'd prefer a name that starts with "pci_" as most of the other interfaces do.
Understood. I was using the function in the other patch series that adds PCIe support to arm64 in order to provide a pci_domain_nr() implementation. But I might not need it in the end if I go ahead with separating pci_host_bridge creation from bus creation. Best regards, Liviu
quoted
void pci_set_host_bridge_release(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge, void (*release_fn)(struct pci_host_bridge *), -- 2.0.0
--
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world, |
| but they're not |
| giving me the |
\ source code! /
---------------
?\_(?)_/?