[PATCH v10 6/7] ARM: add pmd_[dirty|mkclean] for THP
From: minchan@kernel.org (Minchan Kim)
Date: 2014-07-08 01:09:40
Also in:
linux-api, linux-mm, lkml
Subsystem:
arm port, the rest · Maintainers:
Russell King, Linus Torvalds
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 10:22:48AM +0100, Steve Capper wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 09:53:57AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:quoted
MADV_FREE needs pmd_dirty and pmd_mkclean for detecting recent overwrite of the contents since MADV_FREE syscall is called for THP page. This patch adds pmd_dirty and pmd_mkclean for THP page MADV_FREE support. Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <redacted> Cc: Steve Capper <redacted> Cc: Russell King <redacted> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> --- arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h index 579702086488..f3ec01cef04f 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h@@ -240,10 +240,12 @@ static inline pmd_t pte_pmd(pte_t pte) #endif #define pmd_young(pmd) pte_young(pmd_pte(pmd)) +#define pmd_dirty(pmd) pte_dirty(pmd_pte(pmd)) #define pmd_wrprotect(pmd) pte_pmd(pte_wrprotect(pmd_pte(pmd))) #define pmd_mksplitting(pmd) pte_pmd(pte_mkspecial(pmd_pte(pmd))) #define pmd_mkold(pmd) pte_pmd(pte_mkold(pmd_pte(pmd))) #define pmd_mkwrite(pmd) pte_pmd(pte_mkwrite(pmd_pte(pmd))) +#define pmd_mkclean(pmd) pte_pmd(pte_mkclean(pmd_pte(pmd))) #define pmd_mkdirty(pmd) pte_pmd(pte_mkdirty(pmd_pte(pmd))) #define pmd_mkyoung(pmd) pte_pmd(pte_mkyoung(pmd_pte(pmd))) #define pmd_mknotpresent(pmd) (__pmd(pmd_val(pmd) & ~PMD_TYPE_MASK))-- 2.0.0Hi Minchan,
Hello Steve and Will,
This looks good to me too. As Will said this applies to arm64, we will also need a version for: arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h.
Does it work?
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h
index 85c60adc8b60..3a7bb8dc7d05 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h@@ -220,6 +220,8 @@ static inline pmd_t *pmd_offset(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr) #define pmd_trans_splitting(pmd) (pmd_val(pmd) & PMD_SECT_SPLITTING) #endif +#define pmd_dirty (pmd_val(pmd) & PMD_SECT_DIRTY) + #define PMD_BIT_FUNC(fn,op) \ static inline pmd_t pmd_##fn(pmd_t pmd) { pmd_val(pmd) op; return pmd; }
@@ -228,6 +230,7 @@ PMD_BIT_FUNC(mkold, &= ~PMD_SECT_AF); PMD_BIT_FUNC(mksplitting, |= PMD_SECT_SPLITTING); PMD_BIT_FUNC(mkwrite, &= ~PMD_SECT_RDONLY); PMD_BIT_FUNC(mkdirty, |= PMD_SECT_DIRTY); +PMD_BIT_FUNC(mkclean, &= ~PMD_SECT_DIRTY); PMD_BIT_FUNC(mkyoung, |= PMD_SECT_AF); #define pmd_mkhuge(pmd) (__pmd(pmd_val(pmd) & ~PMD_TABLE_BIT))
--
2.0.0
>
> Is there a testcase we can run to check that this patch set is working
> well for arm/arm64?
I just run several instance of attached simple stress with heavy kernel
build in parallel on 1G RAM machine.
Thanks for the review!
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Steve
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo at kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email at kvack.org </a>
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: thp_alloc.c
Type: text/x-csrc
Size: 1328 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140708/db0fab14/attachment.bin>