On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 07:56:54AM +0100, Z Lim wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Will Deacon [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Does this sound remotely feasible?
So I looked at insn.c and the only overlap at this point is B/BL codegen.
A whole lot more, e.g. arithmetic, logical, and memory ops, will need
to be shuffled in.
Yup, the more the merrier. I just want to avoid having N subtley different
encoders/decoders, as this stuff tends to be hard to review and easy to make
small mistakes.
Let me address Alexei's review comments and send out a v2.
After that, I can take a stab at consolidating bpf_jit.h into
insn.{c,h}. Sounds good to you?
Perfect.
Will