[Patch v7 3/3] usb: dwc3: qcom: Add device tree binding
From: Andy Gross <hidden>
Date: 2014-07-01 18:01:17
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, lkml
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 12:04:35AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: <snip>
quoted
+- clock-names: Should contain the following: + "core" Master/Core clock, have to be >= 125 MHz for SS + operation and >= 60MHz for HS operation + +Optional clocks: + "iface" System bus AXI clock. Not present on all platformsReally?, some platforms have a clockless bus?
Some platforms require core and interface. The specific platform I tested on does not have an iface clk. I'll take a look at the ipq block diagram to see if they did something cute, but i don't believe there is one.
quoted
+ "sleep" Sleep clock, used when USB3 core goes into low + power mode (U3). + +Optional regulator: +- gdsc-supply: phandle to the regulator from globally distributed + switch controllerThe name should reflect the name of the input, not the source.
Ok, I'll revisit this. I took this from the original patch set. <snip>
quoted
+ + ranges; + + status = "disabled"; + + dwc3 at 11000000 { + compatible = "snps,dwc3";This sub-node is just wrong. Why can't you have a single node with ' "qcom,dwc3", "snps,dwc3" ' for the compatible property? All you are adding here is clocks. Does the Synopsys block have no clocks? I guess this is copied from other broken dwc3 bindings... That doesn't mean you have to copy it.
The dwc3 core does not deal with clocks. That is why everyone has a wrapper. That, in addition to pm, has to be handled from the wrapper. That's my take anyway. I am sure Felipe can speak more to this. -- sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation