Hi Chanwoo,

On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Chanwoo Choi [off-list ref] wrote:

Hi,

On 05/23/2014 02:21 AM, Abhilash Kesavan wrote:

quoted

This patchset adds devfreq support on Exynos5250 and Exynos5420.
The patches add the missing INT clock support for exynos5250 and
also add a new 5420 driver. We also have patches which add the
PPMU node and fix a typo in the exynos5250 driver.

Changes since RFC v1:
      - Exynos5420 support has been added to the existent Exynos5250
        driver itself.
      - Rebased on Chanwoo Choi's devfreq consolidation patchset.
      - Removed unused clocks from the clock list
      - Used the PPMU nodes with different compatible strings to
        differentiate between exynos5250 and exynos5420.

The patches have been tested on Exynos5250 based Snow board and Exynos5420
based Peach-Pit boards. They have been prepared on linux-next(20140521) with
the devfreq for-next branch merged. Also applied is the "devfreq resource
management" series from Chanwoo Choi[1].
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/25/826

I sent v2 patchset as following after fixed minor issue:
[PATCHv2 0/5] devfreq: Support resource management functions and code clean
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/9/74

Sorry for the delayed response, I was not in office for the last
couple of weeks. I have got the link wrong here, my patchset was in
fact based on your v2 patchset.

Myungjoo and Chanwoo, do you have any other comments on this patchset
or should I re-base this on the latest devfreq tree and re-send ?

Regards,
Abhilash

Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi