On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 06:05:29PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
On 06/17/2014 04:12 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
quoted
quoted
I just looked at regulator_register() and saw that it does rdev->dev.parent =
dev, so yes this has to be the MFD.
I noticed that many drivers set config.dev = &pdev->dev. The original Chrome OS
max77xxx driver and max77686 are two examples but others drivers do the same:
Not all drivers are DT drivers that bother specifying supplies.
And also I see that mfd_add_device() calls
devm_regulator_bulk_register_supply_alias(&pdev->dev,...) so I'm confused now
about what the correct device should be...
Right, but to do that you need to set those aliases up - have you done
so?
quoted
Do the regulators manage to get their supplies?
There are no current support in mainline for the devices that use the regulators
in this PMIC so I can't tell you if consumers manage to get their supplies
correctly (e.g: if regulator_dev_lookup succeeds).
That's not really relevant here - I'm asking if the regulators get their
own supplies rather than if anything uses them.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140621/3900a496/attachment.sig>