quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
-----Original Message-----
From: iommu-bounces at lists.linux-foundation.org [mailto:iommu-
bounces at lists.linux-foundation.org] On Behalf Of Antonios Motakis
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 10:33 PM
To: alex.williamson at redhat.com; kvmarm at lists.cs.columbia.edu;
iommu at lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: kvm at vger.kernel.org; eric.auger at linaro.org; open list;
will.deacon at arm.com; a.rigo at virtualopensystems.com; Yoder Stuart-B08248;
moderated list:ARM SMMU DRIVER; Antonios Motakis;
tech at virtualopensystems.com; christoffer.dall at linaro.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v6 04/20] iommu/arm-smmu: add capability
IOMMU_CAP_INTR_REMAP
With an ARM SMMU, interrupt remapping should always be safe from the
SMMU's point of view, as it is properly handled by the GIC.
Signed-off-by: Antonios Motakis <redacted>
---
drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c index
15ab2af..ff29402 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
@@ -1544,7 +1544,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_domain_has_cap(struct
iommu_domain *domain,
if (smmu_domain->root_cfg.smmu->features &
ARM_SMMU_FEAT_COHERENT_WALK)
caps |= IOMMU_CAP_CACHE_COHERENCY;
- caps |= IOMMU_CAP_NOEXEC;
+ caps |= IOMMU_CAP_NOEXEC | IOMMU_CAP_INTR_REMAP;
return !!(cap & caps);
}
Why mention this as an IOMMU capability when IOMMU doesn't support it? Also, wouldn't this depend on the GIC IP version? What are we gaining by adding this IOMMU capability list?
-Varun