Thread (38 messages) 38 messages, 8 authors, 2014-06-07

[PATCH 7/7] OF/ACPI/I2C: Add generic match function for the aforementioned systems

From: Lee Jones <hidden>
Date: 2014-06-04 13:28:29
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-i2c, lkml

On Wed, 04 Jun 2014, Mika Westerberg wrote:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 02:37:42PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
quoted
On Wednesday, June 04, 2014 01:09:56 PM Lee Jones wrote:
quoted
Currently this is a helper function for the I2C subsystem to aid the
matching of non-standard compatible strings and devices which use DT
and/or ACPI, but do not supply any nodes (see: [1] Method 4).  However,
it has been made more generic as it can be used to only make one call
for drivers which support any mixture of OF, ACPI and/or I2C matching.

The initial aim is for of_match_device() to be replaced by this call
in all I2C device drivers.

[1] Documentation/i2c/instantiating-devices

Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <redacted>
Mika, can you please have a look at this, please?
I don't see any fundamental problems with this wrt. ACPI.

That said, I find it kind of weird to have generic function that then
has knowledge of how different buses do their matching.

I would rather see something like firmware_device_match(dev) that goes
and matches from DT/ACPI and leave bus specific match to happen internal
to that bus.
Unfortunately that completely defeats the object of the patch.  When a
of_match_device() is invoked it solely looks up devices based on OF
matching, but I2C is special in that devices can be registered via
sysfs, thus will no have device node.  If of_match_device() is called
in one of these instances it will fail.  The idea of this patch is to
generify the matching into something does has the knowledge to firstly
attempt a traditional match, and if that fails will fall back to a
special i2c_{of,acpi}_match_device() which knows how to deal with
node-less registration.

We don't support that for ACPI yet, as I don't have a system to test
it on, but when we do acpi_match_device() in the patch will too be
swapped out for an equivalent i2c_acpi_match_device().

Actually, I've just spotted that this patch is wrong I need to change
it in the following way:
quoted
quoted
---
 include/linux/match.h | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 include/linux/match.h
diff --git a/include/linux/match.h b/include/linux/match.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..20a08e2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/match.h
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
+#include <linux/i2c.h>
+
+static void *device_match(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct device_driver *driver = dev->driver;
+
+	if (!driver)
+		return NULL;
+
+	/* Attempt an OF style match */
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)) {
+		const struct of_device_id *of_match =
+			i2c_of_match_device(driver->of_match_table, dev);
This should be of_match_device()
quoted
quoted
+		if (of_match)
+			return (void *)of_match;
+	}
+
+	/* Then ACPI style match */
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI)) {
+		const struct acpi_device_id *acpi_match	=
+			acpi_match_device(driver->acpi_match_table, dev);
+		if (acpi_match)
+			return (void *)acpi_match;
+	}
+
+	/* Finally an I2C match */
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C)) {
+		struct i2c_client *client = i2c_verify_client(dev);
+		struct i2c_driver *i2c_drv = to_i2c_driver(driver);
+		struct i2c_device_id *i2c_match;
i2c_of_match_device() and later i2c_acpi_match_device() should be here.
quoted
quoted
+		i2c_match = i2c_match_id(i2c_drv->id_table, client);
+		if (i2c_match)
+			return (void *)i2c_match;
+	}
+
+	return NULL;
+}
-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help