Thread (47 messages) 47 messages, 7 authors, 2014-07-01
STALE4383d

[PATCH v6 03/15] irq: gic: support hip04 gic

From: Christoffer Dall <hidden>
Date: 2014-05-15 12:16:26

On 15 May 2014 13:13, Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thursday 15 May 2014 13:08:17 Christoffer Dall wrote:
quoted
On 15 May 2014 12:14, Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Thursday 15 May 2014 10:34:35 Marc Zyngier wrote:
quoted
quoted
+static inline bool gic_is_standard(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
Please loose all of the inlines. The compiler can do this by itself.
quoted
+{
+       return (gic->nr_cpu_if == 8);
+}
+
I think it's actually the common style to spell out the 'inline'
for trivial helpers like this. The compiler doesn't need it, but
it also doesn't hurt and most people write it.
Only in header files, no?

I've been chastised previously for putting this in .c files.
It's crazy to make it a hard rule for C files one way or the other,
given that the compiler doesn't care.

I normally spell out the the inline part in my code because I find
that clearer to read.
if that's the general consensus, I'll stop caring about it then.

-Christoffer
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help