Thread (15 messages) 15 messages, 3 authors, 2014-05-02
DORMANTno replies

[PATCH 1/4] ARM: shmobile: Ignore callbacks for subsys generic_pm_domain_data

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
Date: 2014-05-02 11:57:59
Also in: linux-pm

On Friday, May 02, 2014 11:13:23 AM Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 30 April 2014 22:21, Rafael J. Wysocki [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 07:23:08 PM Simon Horman wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:53:58AM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
quoted
On 30 April 2014 00:45, Rafael J. Wysocki [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Friday, April 25, 2014 10:06:51 AM Simon Horman wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 01:25:14PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
quoted
On 14 April 2014 11:22, Ulf Hansson [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 14 April 2014 03:20, Simon Horman [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 05:26:41PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
quoted
There are no active users of these callbacks, thus there are no benefit
of trying to invoke them.

Cc: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <redacted>
---

I am seeking ack from the SOC maintainers since this needs to go with the other
patches in this patchset on the PM core.
In order to reduce the possibility of conflicts I would prefer
to take this patch through my tree.
Okay, go ahead!
Hi Simon,

Just wanted to know, if you decided to queue this patch in your tree.
Or were there anything else you needed me to fix here?
Sorry for dropping the ball. I will queue-up this patch.
OK

Ulf, since the rest of the series depends on this one (or at least that's
how it looks to me), would you mind resending it when this one gets into the
Linus' tree?
Well, I would prefer if we could go ahead with the rest of the patches
somehow for 3.16, but I guess it will be hard if Simon picks up this
patch!?

Simon,
I guess the reason for your concern were about conflicts, but the file
this patch touch has actually not been modified since Sep 2012. So,
maybe we could go through Rafaels tree anyway?
Yes, my primary concern was conflicts.
But as you point out that seems unlikely.

I have already picked up the patch but the pull request I sent to
the ARM SoC maintainers has not been pulled. And regardless it
won't appear in Linus's tree via that route until v3.16-rc1.

Perhaps a good way forwards would be for Rafael to also apply the patch
with my Ack.
Not really.  No duplicate patches with different changelogs coming from
different trees.  Please!
quoted
I could also revert the version applied to my tree
if that is of any help.

Acked-by: Simon Horman <redacted>
Ulf, can you please do as I said?
Okay! It seems like I have no choice. :-)

Does that mean you were happy with the rest from this patchset?
Yes, those changes are fine by me.
Additionally, I intend to post some more patches for the PM domain
soon. Thus I will need to fold in these patches to any other upcoming
patchset. Thought it could be good to know.
OK, thanks!

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help