[PATCH v6 2/2] Documentation: devicetree: Add boost-frequency binding to list boost mode frequency
From: Sudeep Holla <hidden>
Date: 2014-05-30 18:48:03
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-pm, linux-samsung-soc
On 30/05/14 19:41, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On 30.05.2014 20:38, Sudeep Holla wrote:quoted
On 30/05/14 19:15, Tomasz Figa wrote:quoted
On 30.05.2014 20:05, Thomas Abraham wrote:quoted
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Mark Rutland [off-list ref] wrote:[snip]quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Why are these in both operating-points and boost-frequencies? It'll be really easy to accidentally forget to mark something as a boost-frequency this way. Why not have a boost-points instead?I was told that index is not preferred based on the previous discussions when the OPP bindings were designed. In addition the OPP binding doesn't enforce any ordering. There are thermal bindings that assume otherwise and is broken. So boost-points is not feasible.My understanding of Mark's comment was that the boost-points property would use the same format as operating-points and parsing code would just concatenate operating points with boost points after making the latter with necessary flag or whatever.
Ah, I misunderstood that. That should be fine as it avoids duplication. Regards, Sudeep