[PATCH 1/4] OMAPDSS: Fix DSS clock multiplier issue on 3703 and probably 3630
flat view
From: Tomi Valkeinen <hidden>
Date: 2014-05-12 11:38:04
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-fbdev, linux-omap
On 09/05/14 17:37, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Tomi Valkeinen [off-list ref] [140509 01:02]:quoted
On 09/05/14 02:20, Tony Lindgren wrote:quoted
* Tony Lindgren [off-list ref] [140429 16:53]:quoted
Otherwise we can get often errors like the following and the display won't come on: omapdss APPLY error: FIFO UNDERFLOW on gfx, disabling the overlay omapdss APPLY error: SYNC_LOST on channel lcd, restarting the output with video overlays disabled There are some earlier references to this issue: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg59511.html http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg59724.html It seems that it's safe to set the lower values even for 3630. If we can confirm that 3630 works with the higher values reliably we can add further detection.BTW, I'm also seeing this warning on 3730-evm it may be related: [ 3.523101] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 3.528015] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 6 at drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/dss/dss.c:483 dss_set_fck_rate+0x6c/0x8c() [ 3.538360] clk rate mismatch: 108000000 != 115200000 [ 3.543518] Modules linked in:Hmm... Can you paste the clk_summary from debugfs? Somehow the clock framework calculates the clock rate differently than the dss. Or do we have different clock.dts files used for 3730 and 3630?OK pasted to the other email in this thread.
I mean the debugs for clock framework. The above warning means that the clock framework says the clock rate is X, but the dss had calculated that it should be Y. So there's a difference how the clock framework calculates the rate and how the dss calculates it. And yes, dss shouldn't calculate it. But I don't know how to get good pixel clocks if we didn't. Tomi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140512/80e703a7/attachment.sig>