Hi Tomasz,
On 16 May 2014 02:56, Tomasz Figa [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Chander,
On 14.05.2014 10:03, Chander Kashyap wrote:
quoted
Exynos5420 is big.Little Soc. It uses cpuidle-big-litle generic cpuidle driver.
Hence do not allow exynos cpuidle driver registration for Exynos5420.
Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap <redacted>
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <redacted>
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c
index 3dd385e..807a386 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c
@@ -218,6 +218,9 @@ static int exynos_cpuidle_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
int cpu_id, ret;
struct cpuidle_device *device;
+ if (soc_is_exynos5420())
+ return -ENODEV;
+
if (soc_is_exynos5250())
exynos5_core_down_clk();
Why not put this in exynos.c in exynos_dt_machine_init(), so
exynos_cpuidle_init() is called only if not running on Exynos5420?
That makes more sense.
I will update this
Thanks
Best regards,
Tomasz
--
with warm regards,
Chander Kashyap