[PATCH v2 06/10] clk: berlin: add core clock driver for BG2/BG2CD
From: Alexandre Belloni <hidden>
Date: 2014-05-15 16:55:37
Also in:
lkml
On 15/05/2014 at 17:43:03 +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote :
On 05/15/2014 10:09 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:quoted
On 14/05/2014 at 22:15:17 +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote :quoted
+ /* clock divider cells */ + parent_names[1] = avpllb_names[CH4]; + parent_names[2] = avpllb_names[CH5]; + parent_names[3] = avpllb_names[CH6]; + parent_names[4] = avpllb_names[CH7]; + + parent_names[0] = refclk_names[SYSPLL];It should actually be: parent_names[0] = avpllb_names[CH4]; parent_names[1] = avpllb_names[CH5]; parent_names[2] = avpllb_names[CH6]; parent_names[3] = avpllb_names[CH7]; parent_names[4] = refclk_names[SYSPLL];Given the comment to remove index 0 in the last patch, I translate that into: "the input mux bypass is there, but {cannot,should not,we do not want it to} be used". *sigh* Actually, almost all of this is based on Chromecast mirrored BSP code and I though about leaving the bypass mux in - even if it is not used at all. The reason is that I am _very_ tired of reading through the BSP code and have all the things in mind where the BSP code is unclear.
Ok, I made a mistake, I also have a hard time to picture everything myself ;) So, the mux is there iand can be used, hence, the parents are actually: parent_names[0] = refclk_names[SYSPLL]; parent_names[1] = avpllb_names[CH4]; parent_names[2] = avpllb_names[CH5]; parent_names[3] = avpllb_names[CH6]; parent_names[4] = avpllb_names[CH7]; parent_names[5] = refclk_names[SYSPLL]; and disregard my comment on the previous patch.
quoted
quoted
+ data = &bg2_divs[CLKID_SYS]; + clks[CLKID_SYS] = berlin2_div_register(&data->map, base, data->name, + data->div_flags, parent_names, 5, data->flags, &lock); + + parent_names[0] = refclk_names[CPUPLL]; + parent_names[5] = refclk_names[MEMPLL];The only valid choice here should be (remember, we are not adding 1 to the index anymore): parent_names[4] = refclk_names[MEMPLL];
There, you actually had it right, maybe we could set parent_names[1] to parent_names[4] to something bogus or all to refclk_names[MEMPLL].
Funny to see that there ought to be a CPUPLL which isn't used by the CPU at all. This also implies to remove CPUPLL, right?quoted
quoted
+ data = &bg2_divs[CLKID_CPU]; + clks[CLKID_CPU] = berlin2_div_register(&data->map, base, data->name, + data->div_flags, parent_names, 6, data->flags, &lock); +This is where it gets tricky, now we should have: parent_names[0] = avpllb_names[CH4]; parent_names[1] = avplla_names[CH5]; parent_names[2] = avpllb_names[CH6]; parent_names[3] = avpllb_names[CH7]; parent_names[4] = refclk_names[SYSPLL];First I thought that it is just the default input mux clocks again.. but then I noticed that it is actually AVPLL_A5 not B5.
Here it becomes: parent_names[0] = refclk_names[SYSPLL]; parent_names[1] = avpllb_names[CH4]; parent_names[2] = avplla_names[CH5]; parent_names[3] = avpllb_names[CH6]; parent_names[4] = avpllb_names[CH7]; parent_names[5] = refclk_names[SYSPLL];
Ok, I admit having confirmed information is maybe better. So, you agree that we can remove the input mux bypass on the complex divider, too? (Including all the consequences: remove it from the divmap, driver, ...)
No, let's keep the mux, sorry about that confusion. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com