On Wednesday 23 April 2014 17:04:36 Maxime Ripard wrote:

 
-static void __init sunxi_dt_init(void)
-{
-       of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table, NULL, NULL);
-}
-
-static const char * const sunxi_board_dt_compat[] = {
-       "allwinner,sun4i-a10",
-       "allwinner,sun5i-a10s",
-       "allwinner,sun5i-a13",
-       NULL,
-};
-
-DT_MACHINE_START(SUNXI_DT, "Allwinner A1X (Device Tree)")
-       .init_machine   = sunxi_dt_init,
-       .dt_compat      = sunxi_board_dt_compat,
-MACHINE_END
-
 static const char * const sun6i_board_dt_compat[] = {
        "allwinner,sun6i-a31",
        NULL,

I'd like to hear more opinions on this. We could either rely
on the generic code, or we could keep the entry with just
the .dt_compat line and the name, so /proc/cpuinfo contains
a meaningful platform name.

Either approach works for me, but I think we should do this
consistent across platforms. Olof, do you have an opinion?

	Arnd