On Thursday 20 March 2014, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
On 19/03/2014 20:28, Arnd Bergmann :
quoted
at91x40 is different from all the other at91 machines, and it is
impossible to build a kernel that works on both this SoC and
any of the others, even though it is possible to build a noMMU
kernel for any at91 machine.
By turning at91x40 into a separate top-level option, we explicitly
forbid enabling invalid configurations that include mutually exclusive
machines.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Andrew Victor <redacted>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <redacted>
I added below little modifications to the comments, now that the AT91X40
is another entry.
Otherwise:
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <redacted>
Changed now, thanks for the suggestion!
Arnd