On Monday 24 March 2014, Jason Cooper wrote:

arm-soc maintainers,

On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 01:45:55PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:

quoted

This patchset fixes up a number of issues found by checkpatch in the
kirkwood DT files or binding Documentation. Vendor Prefixes are
documented, missing prefixes are added, incorrect prefixes are
corrected, and Kirkwood SoCs are documented.

Note that some of these patches contain UTF-8 characters, which the
mailing lists sometime don't like. The patches can also be found in

https://github.com/lunn/linux.git v3.14-rc7-next-20140321-dt

which is based on linux-next tag next-20140321.

I'd like to take this in as 'fixes-non-critical' for v3.15.  However,
I'm having trouble finding a stable, conflict-free branch to base it on.
The main problem seems to be vendor-prefixes.txt.

How would you prefer I handle this?  Or, would you guys just like to
take the series directly?  I'm fine either way.

If taking directly,

Acked-by: Jason Cooper <redacted>

I think Rob should take the binding changes, we can take the dts file
changes. Can you send them as patches relative to the next/dt branch
to arm at kernel.org?

	Arnd