On 03/06/2014 10:44 PM, Kevin Cernekee wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 7:41 PM, Alex Elder [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
This patchset adds very minimal support for the BCM63138 SoC which is
a xDSL SoC using a dual Cortex A9 CPU complex.
Why do you use "63xx" for the generic name, when the specific
part you are defining here is 63138? I would have expected
"63xxx".
The product line has a mix of 4-digit and 5-digit part numbers. The
drivers for onchip peripherals all used "bcm63xx":
That's too bad. I would suggest that one or the other be used
consistently, apparently "63xx" (not 63xxx) would be it.
-Alex
$ find drivers/ | grep 63xx
drivers/tty/serial/bcm63xx_uart.c
drivers/pcmcia/bcm63xx_pcmcia.h
drivers/pcmcia/bcm63xx_pcmcia.c
drivers/usb/gadget/bcm63xx_udc.c
drivers/watchdog/max63xx_wdt.c
drivers/watchdog/bcm63xx_wdt.c
drivers/char/hw_random/bcm63xx-rng.c
drivers/mtd/bcm63xxpart.c
drivers/net/phy/bcm63xx.c
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bcm63xx_enet.h
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bcm63xx_enet.c
drivers/spi/spi-bcm63xx.c
drivers/spi/spi-bcm63xx-hsspi.c