On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 04:39:45PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
Quoting Maxime Ripard (2014-02-18 06:05:16)
quoted
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:02:15AM +0100, David Lanzend?rfer wrote:
quoted
From: Emilio L?pez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>
This commit implements .determine_rate, so that our factor clocks can be
reparented when needed.
Signed-off-by: Emilio L?pez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>
Your signed-off-by is missing here.
Once you added it, you can add my Acked-by
Yes the patch looks good to me as well. Am I correct in thinking that it
is independent of the MMC clock phase discussion? If it is resubmitted
with a proper SoB then I can pick it.
Yes, it's completely independant of the MMC phase stuff.
Emilio, or David, could you resend it?
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140320/2de77768/attachment.sig>