[PATCH v2] gpio: davinci: fix gpio selection for OF
From: grygorii.strashko@ti.com (Grygorii Strashko)
Date: 2014-03-17 14:12:05
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-gpio, lkml
On 03/17/2014 03:29 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
On Friday 14 March 2014 04:32 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:quoted
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Alexander Holler [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Am 11.03.2014 11:15, schrieb Linus Walleij:quoted
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Alexander Holler [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
The driver missed an of_xlate function to translate gpio numbers as found in the DT to the correct chip and number. While there I've set #gpio_cells to a fixed value of 2. I've used gpio-pxa.c as template for those changes and tested my changes successfully on a da850 board using entries for gpio-leds in a DT. So I didn't reinvent the wheel but just copied and tested stuff. Thanks to Grygorii Strashko for the hint to the existing code in gpio-pxa. Signed-off-by: Alexander Holler <redacted> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>This v2 version applied, thanks!Thanks, but actually that should have been a fix for 3.14 with which the OF functionality for davinci gpio gets introduced. I assum with the patch in for-next, 3.14 will appear with that functionality broken and it will become a candidate for -stable.I just get the impression that DT support for DaVinci in v3.14 is so risky and unstable that noone except those implementing it (i.e. you) is really using it, is that correct? In that case it is hardly a fix that we need to rush out to the entire world.One thing to note is that this driver is used by keystone too and all its users are DT-only. Although I do not see any in-kernel DT GPIO users even there. I can confirm the patch does not break my gpiolib based test module (test with and without DT), but then it did not have an issue even before.
The issues isn't observed on Keystone2 as it has <32 gpios as of now, also GPIO support for keystone is going to be added in 3.15 (including DT changes). Regards, -grygorii