[PATCH v3 2/5] pinctrl: st: Enhance the controller to manage unavailable registers
From: Maxime Coquelin <hidden>
Date: 2014-03-11 10:57:00
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
On 03/11/2014 09:18 AM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
On 03/10/2014 10:17 AM, Lee Jones wrote:quoted
quoted
From: Giuseppe Cavallaro <redacted> This patch adds a new logic inside the st pinctrl to manage an unsupported scenario: some sysconfig are not available! This is the case of STiH407 where, although documented, the following registers from SYSCFG_FLASH have been removed from the SoC. SYSTEM_CONFIG3040 Output Enable pad control for all PIO Alternate Functions and SYSTEM_ CONFIG3050 Pull Up pad control for all PIO Alternate Functions Without managing this condition an imprecise external abort will be detect. To do this the patch also reviews the st_parse_syscfgs and other routines to manipulate the registers only if actually available. In any case, for example the st_parse_syscfgs detected an error condition but no action was made in the st_pctl_probe_dt. Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <redacted> Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Cavallaro <redacted>These two SOBs need reordering.Right, this will be changed here and everywhere else in the series.quoted
quoted
--- drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c | 106 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c index 9fb66aa..1721611 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c
<snip>
quoted
quoted
-static int st_parse_syscfgs(struct st_pinctrl *info, - int bank, struct device_node *np) + +static struct regmap_field *st_pc_get_value(struct device *dev, + struct regmap *regmap, int bank, + int data, int lsb, int msb) +{ + struct reg_field reg = REG_FIELD((data + bank) * 4, lsb, msb); + + if (data < 0) + return NULL;What happens is data < 0 and it's used in REG_FIELD?Nothing bad, but I agree this is not crystal clear.quoted
Would it make more sense to make this check before calling REG_FIELD?Yes, it will be done in the v4.
Finally, I have to keep it as it was if I want this patch to compile.
<snip> Thanks, Maxime _______________________________________________ Kernel mailing list Kernel at stlinux.com http://www.stlinux.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel