[PATCH v2 2/5] pinctrl: st: add pinctrl support for the STiH407 SoC
From: srinivas kandagatla <hidden>
Date: 2014-03-07 10:50:39
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
From: srinivas kandagatla <hidden>
Date: 2014-03-07 10:50:39
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
Hi Peppe/Maxime, On 07/03/14 09:41, Maxime COQUELIN wrote:
From: Giuseppe Cavallaro <redacted> This patch adds the initial support for pinctrl based on H407 SoC. Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <redacted> Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Cavallaro <redacted> --- drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c index 9fb66aa..9e9b6ea 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c@@ -1580,6 +1580,10 @@ static struct of_device_id st_pctl_of_match[] = { { .compatible = "st,stih416-rear-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data}, { .compatible = "st,stih416-fvdp-fe-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data}, { .compatible = "st,stih416-fvdp-lite-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data}, + { .compatible = "st,stih407-sbc-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data}, + { .compatible = "st,stih407-front-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data}, + { .compatible = "st,stih407-rear-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data}, + { .compatible = "st,stih407-flash-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data},
In the follow on patch this is changed to stih407_flashdata. Why should this not be done in this patch itself.
{ /* sentinel */ }
};
Other than that the patch looks Ok to me. Acked-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <redacted> Thanks, srini