Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 2 authors, 2014-03-07

[PATCH v2 2/5] pinctrl: st: add pinctrl support for the STiH407 SoC

From: srinivas kandagatla <hidden>
Date: 2014-03-07 10:50:39
Also in: linux-devicetree, lkml

Hi Peppe/Maxime,
On 07/03/14 09:41, Maxime COQUELIN wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Giuseppe Cavallaro <redacted>

This patch adds the initial support for pinctrl based on H407 SoC.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Cavallaro <redacted>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c
index 9fb66aa..9e9b6ea 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c
@@ -1580,6 +1580,10 @@ static struct of_device_id st_pctl_of_match[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "st,stih416-rear-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data},
 	{ .compatible = "st,stih416-fvdp-fe-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data},
 	{ .compatible = "st,stih416-fvdp-lite-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data},
+	{ .compatible = "st,stih407-sbc-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data},
+	{ .compatible = "st,stih407-front-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data},
+	{ .compatible = "st,stih407-rear-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data},
+	{ .compatible = "st,stih407-flash-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data},
In the follow on patch this is changed to stih407_flashdata.

Why should this not be done in this patch itself.
 	{ /* sentinel */ }
 };
 
Other than that the patch looks Ok to me.

Acked-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <redacted>

Thanks,
srini
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help