Thread (3 messages) flat view 3 messages, 3 authors, 2014-02-19

[PATCH v4 1/7] Documentation: Add device tree bindings for Freescale i.MX GPC

From: p.zabel@pengutronix.de (Philipp Zabel)
Date: 2014-02-19 09:30:55
Also in: linux-devicetree

Hi Arnd,

[adding Samsung guys into the loop]

Am Dienstag, den 18.02.2014, 19:10 +0100 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
On Tuesday 18 February 2014 16:34:41 Philipp Zabel wrote:
quoted
+
+Example of a device that is part of a power domain:
+
+       vpu: vpu at 02040000 {
+               reg = <0x02040000 0x3c000>;
+               /* ... */
+               fsl,power-domain = <&pd_pu>;
+               /* ... */
+       };
+
I'm really not too happy about platforms starting to add random
bindings for power domains. Unfortunately I didn't catch exynos
doing this first, but I don't want to see another platform like
that.

Can we please come up with a proper generic power domain binding
first and then add platform specific users?
what is the process here? I've seen the samsung bindings and copied the
pattern. I guess the Exynos bindings are set in stone, and the i.MX
power domains can be handled using the same bindings.

regards
Philipp
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help