[PATCH v4 2/4] DT: Vendor prefixes: Add ricoh, ssi and synology

On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:07:04AM +1000, Ben Peddell wrote:

On 18/02/2014 8:34 AM, Josh Cartwright wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 07:45:35AM +1000, klightspeed at killerwolves.net wrote:

quoted

From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>

The following patches make use of vendor names ricoh, ssi and
synology.  Add them to the vendor prefix list.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <redacted>
---
v2:
Use stock ticker for Ricoh as vendor name
s/Richoh/Ricoh/
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
index 40ce2df..8427681 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt

@@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ ralink	Mediatek/Ralink Technology Corp.
 ramtron	Ramtron International
 realtek Realtek Semiconductor Corp.
 renesas	Renesas Electronics Corporation
+ricoy	Ricoh Co. Ltd.
 rockchip	Fuzhou Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd
 samsung	Samsung Semiconductor
 sbs	Smart Battery System

@@ -79,11 +80,13 @@ schindler	Schindler
 sil	Silicon Image
 silabs	Silicon Laboratories
 simtek
+sii	Seiko Instruments, Inc.
 sirf	SiRF Technology, Inc.
 snps 	Synopsys, Inc.
 st	STMicroelectronics
 ste	ST-Ericsson
 stericsson	ST-Ericsson
+synology	Synology, Inc.

Oh, great!  Looks like this one is added (see my comment on patch 1).
I'm wondering if 'qnap' should be added as well.

Do we want to use "qnap" or their ticker "qnapsz"?

Hi Ben

Ticker.

It might also make sense to re-arrange the order of these patches, so
that this one comes first and then the power off patch. However it is
not too important, because the patches are probably going to get split
up and go thought different maintainers.

   Andrew