[PATCH v4 2/4] DT: Vendor prefixes: Add ricoh, ssi and synology
From: Ben Peddell <hidden>
Date: 2014-02-18 00:07:04
Also in:
linux-devicetree
On 18/02/2014 8:34 AM, Josh Cartwright wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 07:45:35AM +1000, klightspeed at killerwolves.net wrote:quoted
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> The following patches make use of vendor names ricoh, ssi and synology. Add them to the vendor prefix list. Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Acked-by: Jason Cooper <redacted> --- v2: Use stock ticker for Ricoh as vendor name s/Richoh/Ricoh/ --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt index 40ce2df..8427681 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt@@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ ralink Mediatek/Ralink Technology Corp. ramtron Ramtron International realtek Realtek Semiconductor Corp. renesas Renesas Electronics Corporation +ricoy Ricoh Co. Ltd. rockchip Fuzhou Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd samsung Samsung Semiconductor sbs Smart Battery System@@ -79,11 +80,13 @@ schindler Schindler sil Silicon Image silabs Silicon Laboratories simtek +sii Seiko Instruments, Inc. sirf SiRF Technology, Inc. snps Synopsys, Inc. st STMicroelectronics ste ST-Ericsson stericsson ST-Ericsson +synology Synology, Inc.Oh, great! Looks like this one is added (see my comment on patch 1). I'm wondering if 'qnap' should be added as well.
Do we want to use "qnap" or their ticker "qnapsz"?