On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:37:09AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
- pl022->clk = devm_clk_get(&adev->dev, NULL);
+ /*
+ * For compatibility with old DTBs and platform data, fall back to the
+ * first clock if there's not an explicitly named "sspclk" entry.
+ */
+ pl022->clk = devm_clk_get(&adev->dev, "sspclk");
+ if (IS_ERR(pl022->clk))
+ pl022->clk = devm_clk_get(&adev->dev, NULL);
+
I'll just have a bit of a grumble here and point out that this sort of
stuff always worries me with the convention of using nameless clocks -
it causes hassle adding further clocks.
In any case you didn't CC me on the cover letter or any of the non-SPI
patches so I'm not sure what the dependencies are here (if there are
any), does the series need to go in as one?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140211/3074ea65/attachment.sig>