[PATCH] arm: msm: remove MACH_MSM7X30_SURF

Daniel,

On Sun, 2014-02-16 at 23:14 +0000, dwalker at fifo99.com wrote:

On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 06:34:40PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:

quoted

The Kconfig symbol MACH_MSM7X30_SURF was added in v2.6.35. It has never
been used. Setting it has no effect. There are no calls for
machine_is_mach_msm7x30(). This symbol can safely be removed.

Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <redacted>
---
Tested only with "git grep".

 arch/arm/mach-msm/Kconfig | 7 -------
 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-msm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-msm/Kconfig
index 9625cf3..dab941a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-msm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-msm/Kconfig

@@ -62,7 +62,6 @@ config ARCH_MSM7X30
 	select ARCH_MSM_SCORPION
 	select CPU_V7
 	select GPIO_MSM_V1
-	select MACH_MSM7X30_SURF # if !
 	select MSM_GPIOMUX
 	select MSM_PROC_COMM
 	select MSM_SMD

@@ -115,12 +114,6 @@ config MACH_TROUT
 	help
 	  Support for the HTC Dream, T-Mobile G1, Android ADP1 devices.
 
-config MACH_MSM7X30_SURF
-	depends on ARCH_MSM7X30
-	bool "MSM7x30 SURF"
-	help
-	  Support for the Qualcomm MSM7x30 SURF eval board.
-

It's not really enough .. There are support files for this platform, if you remove it you need to remove
those files also. You could also go the other way and connect the config option to those files.

What support files are you thinking about here?

(Note that I need to rethink this patch anyway. The discussion about the
patch that removes MACH_MXLADS showed me that machine_is_mach_msm7x30()
is used in a more subtle way than I remembered. I hope to revisit this
and similar patches in a few days to review them myself.)

Thanks,


Paul Bolle