On Tuesday 11 February 2014, Michal Simek wrote:

quoted

quoted

The only remaining question is if we should create generic DT binding
for fifo depth. Arnd, Rob: Any opinion about it?
Definitely will be worth to have one generic binding if this is generic feature.
But if this is just specific feature for us then current properties should
be fine.

In general all these xlnx,XXX properties just reflect all configurable options
which you can setup in design tool which means that provide full hw description
with all variants and they are automatically generated from tools.

Please let me know what you think.

I like:

    rx-fifo-depth
    tx-fifo-depth

No problem with that. Let Kedar to fix it according this and he will send v2 with this.

Sounds reasonable to me too.

	Arnd