On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 14:12 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 02:31:12PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:

quoted

If so, to be absolutely sure we start from the same point: do you agree
that the above line now effectively reads
    depends on SND_SOC_SAMSUNG && (MACH_SMDK6410 || MACH_SMDKC100 || MACH_SMDKV210 || MACH_SMDKC110 || false || false)

quoted

because there's neither a Kconfig symbol MACH_SMDKV310 nor a Kconfig
symbol MACH_SMDKC210?

Yes, that's correct.  Now, like I say think about what the symbol was
there for in the first place.

So, next step: the Kconfig symbols MACH_SMDKV310 and MACH_SMDKC210 were
removed in commit 383ffda2fa ("ARM: EXYNOS: no more support non-DT for
EXYNOS SoCs"). That commit was part of v3.11. Correct?

Thanks for your patience.


Paul Bolle