Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 4 authors, 2014-01-12
STALE4538d REVIEWED: 1 (0M)

[PATCH 2/2] i2c: mv64xxx: Fix bus hang on A0 version of the Armada XP SoCs

From: Wolfram Sang <hidden>
Date: 2014-01-02 18:41:21
Also in: linux-i2c

On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 01:28:22PM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote:
Wolfram,

On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 05:01:16PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
quoted
The first variants of Armada XP SoCs (A0 stepping) have issues related
to the i2c controller which prevent to use the offload mechanism and
lead to a kernel hang during boot.

The driver now check the revision of the SoC. If the revision is not
more recent than the A0 or if the driver can't get the SoC revision
then it disables the offload mechanism.

Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <redacted>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c | 11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c
index 8be7e42aa4de..089a3663ad86 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
 #include <linux/clk.h>
 #include <linux/err.h>
 #include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/mvebu-soc-id.h>
 
 #define MV64XXX_I2C_ADDR_ADDR(val)			((val & 0x7f) << 1)
 #define MV64XXX_I2C_BAUD_DIV_N(val)			(val & 0x7)
@@ -779,8 +780,16 @@ mv64xxx_of_config(struct mv64xxx_i2c_data *drv_data,
 	 * Transaction Generator support and the errata fix.
 	 */
 	if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "marvell,mv78230-i2c")) {
-		drv_data->offload_enabled = true;
+		u32 dev, rev;
+
 		drv_data->errata_delay = true;
+		/*
+		 * Only revison more recent than A0 support offload
+		 * mechanism. In case we can't get the SoC revision
+		 * weplay safe and we don't enable it
+		 */
+		if (!mvebu_get_soc_id(&rev, &dev) && (dev > MV78XX0_A0_REV))
Very minor nits:

I'd prefer (mvebu_get_soc_id == 0) here, since !mvebu_get_soc_id can
easily be read as "if not get soc id" which leads to the assumption the
function failed. And the parantheses around the second comparison are
superfluous.
quoted
+			drv_data->offload_enabled = true;
Since this depends on arch-specific code in the previous patch, I'd like
to keep the two of them together in a topic branch.  Would you prefer to
take both with my Ack, or vice-versa?  I'm fine either way.
I'd think you better take it:

Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <redacted>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140102/f901950c/attachment-0001.sig>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help