Mike Turquette [off-list ref] writes:

Quoting Haojian Zhuang (2014-01-14 21:59:40)

quoted

On 01/15/2014 11:53 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:

quoted

Quoting zhangfei (2014-01-14 17:40:25)

quoted

Dear Mike

On 01/15/2014 04:17 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:

quoted

Quoting Zhangfei Gao (2014-01-13 01:14:28)

quoted

Suggest by Arnd: abstract mmc tuning as clock behavior,
also because different soc have different tuning method and registers.
hi3620_mmc_clks is added to handle mmc clock specifically on hi3620.

Signed-off-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>

Patch looks good to me with one exception. I do not have
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/hisilicon/hisilicon.txt in the
clk-next branch. Is there a stable branch I can pull in as a dependency?

Mach-hisi just have been uploaeded.
Have tried next-20140114, the patch can be applied successfully.
While v3.13-rc8 still can not.

Is this fine?

Can you give me a link to the branch that introduces
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/hisilicon/hisilicon.txt?

I guess the patch introducing it is going through arm-soc. Is this going
in for 3.14? If so then perhaps the clk tree and the arm-soc tree can
share a stable branch that introduces it.

Regards,
Mike

Some patches are merged into arm-soc, and others are in clk tree.
If sharing a stable branch between arm-soc and clk tree, it only means
that we need to revert all commits that are in arm-soc and clk tree.
I think it's too complex.

I'm suggesting reverting any patches that are applied to arm-soc. I'm
only suggesting that there might be a common branch that both the clk
and arm-soc trees can depend on to fix this problem.

This one is stable, and is where the binding is introduced:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-soc.git hisi/soc

quoted

How about split the patch? The patch on document should enter in arm-soc.

That is one approach. You might want to run it past the arm-soc folks
first to see if they will take in the binding definition for 3.14.

We're not taking anything new for 3.14.

Kevin