Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2014-01-13
  • (off-list ancestor, not in this archive)
  • Re: DT include files · Stephen Warren <hidden> · 2014-01-13

DT include files

From: Stephen Warren <hidden>
Date: 2014-01-13 16:48:43
Also in: linux-devicetree

On 01/10/2014 10:03 AM, Gerhard Sittig wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 09:30 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
quoted
As for *.h vs. *.dtsi naming, if the include is only pre-processor
defines, then I think using .h is the right way. Otherwise, if there
is any dts syntax, then .dtsi is the right name. It looks to me like
this style has been followed in both the imx and s3c64xx cases.

On a side note, I'm not really a fan of this pattern:

#define FOO1 1 2 3

#define BAR FOO1 FOO2 FOO3

While it definitely simplifies the dts files, it would never be used
in C and obfuscates what the actual property size is. Reading a dts
file, I would naturally assume the define was a single value while in
fact it could expand to a very large property size.
For more complex yet tedious repetitive cases like GPIO banks and
pins I've seen #define directives which introduce "functions"
(macros with parameters).  They appear to be rather useful, can
reflect very well the essence of the information, don't
necessarily pretend to be single values, but still may hide how
many cells they expand to.  For example:

  arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-cardhu.dtsi:
    interrupts = <TEGRA_GPIO(L, 0) IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
I'm not sure I entirely understand your point, but for the record, both
TEGRA_GPIO() and IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH expand to a single cell, as I would
expect (almost?) any DT macro to do.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help