[PATCH v2 0/5] arm64: advertise availability of CRC and crypto instructions
From: Nicolas Pitre <hidden>
Date: 2014-01-20 18:55:13
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 20 January 2014 19:17, Nicolas Pitre [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:quoted
Calling getauxval(AT_HWCAP) on an outdated libc.so will give you the whole value, not just the bits whose meaning was known to glibc at the time. So if desired, a program can interpret AT_HWCAP itself. AT_HWCAP2 is completely new, so you won't be able to retrieve it using getauxval() on an older libc.I agree. And I don't dispute the bit placement choice either. Still, an old glibc calling getauxval(AT_HWCAP) should already be prepared to receive and rightfully ignore those bits it didn't know the meaning of at the time. So "preserving some future extensions in HWCAP for older glibc" as a justification makes little sense to me... unless I'm missing something? Even if applications interpret those bits themselves, supposing they still need to be linked against an old glibc, then why would yet-to-be-defined future extensions be more important to be signaled using the lower 32 bits than the extensions you propose? That is what I don't get.In the general case, you are quite right. In this particular case, the extensions for which I am adding the feature bits are not supported on any hardware currently known or supported by the ARM port. At this time, the only known CPUs supporting these extensions are ARMv8 CPUs executing in 32-bit compatibility mode (i.e., ARMv8 defines instructions for the 32-bit execution state using previously unallocated opcodes)
So?
So the only reason (currently) for adding these feature bits to the ARM port is to align with the ARMv8 32-bit compat mode so that a 32-bit userland requires no knowledge about whether its 32-bit execution environment is hosted by an ARM or an arm64 kernel. In the future, ARMv8 32-bit only CPUs may well turn up that support these extensions as well.
I agree with all you've said so far. But that doesn't answer my question. And my unanswered question isn't that important either. Nicolas