Hi Stephen,
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 08:54:27PM +0000, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 01/15, Stephen Boyd wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
index 789d846a9184..e76750980b38 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -295,9 +297,15 @@ validate_group(struct perf_event *event)
static irqreturn_t armpmu_dispatch_irq(int irq, void *dev)
{
- struct arm_pmu *armpmu = (struct arm_pmu *) dev;
- struct platform_device *plat_device = armpmu->plat_device;
- struct arm_pmu_platdata *plat = dev_get_platdata(&plat_device->dev);
+ struct arm_pmu *armpmu;
+ struct platform_device *plat_device;
+ struct arm_pmu_platdata *plat;
+
+ if (irq_is_percpu(irq))
+ dev = *(struct arm_pmu_cpu **)dev;
Oh. I just realized that struct arm_pmu_cpu doesn't even exist. This
still compiles though because we're dealing with a void pointer.
Perhaps its better to just do
dev = *(void **)dev;
here. Can you fix that up when applying? Otherwise I'll do it on
the next send if there are more comments.
Shouldn't that actually be some per_cpu accessor like this_cpu_ptr?
Will