[PATCH v4 02/15] clk: Allow drivers to pass in a regmap
From: Saravana Kannan <hidden>
Date: 2014-01-14 03:54:48
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, lkml
On 01/08/2014 05:51 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
Quoting Stephen Boyd (2013-12-23 17:12:26)quoted
Add support to the clock core so that drivers can pass in a regmap. If no regmap is specified try to query the device that's registering the clock for its regmap. This should allow drivers to use the core regmap helpers. This is based on a similar design in the regulator framework. Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <redacted> --- drivers/clk/clk.c | 8 ++++++++ include/linux/clk-provider.h | 7 +++++++ 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c index 9ad7b71..5e71f5c 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ #include <linux/device.h> #include <linux/init.h> #include <linux/sched.h> +#include <linux/regmap.h> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(enable_lock); static DEFINE_MUTEX(prepare_lock);@@ -1834,6 +1835,13 @@ static int _clk_register(struct device *dev, struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk *clk) clk->num_parents = hw->init->num_parents; hw->clk = clk; + if (hw->init->regmap) + hw->regmap = hw->init->regmap;Hi Stephen, The whole series looks good to me except for the placement of the regmap details inside struct clk_hw. That structure exists only to hide struct clk from the hardware-specific clock structure and I'd not like to set the precedent of shoving per-clock data into it. As an alternative, how about finding a way to put these per-clock regmap details into the hardware-specific clock structure? I understand that you want to make these ops available to others, which is why they are in the public struct clk_hw. I'm just wondering if that is the right way to do it... Patch #3 illustrates the sort of struct-member-creep that worries me. What is to stop someone from putting "unsigned int divider_reg" or "unsigned int mux_reg", and then the thing just keeps growing.
I agree with Mike here. This definitely encourages struct field creep if more people want to use it. I talked to Stephen is person and my recommendation is to not have any new fields other than struct regmap in clk_hw and remove the above 2 lines of code.
quoted
+ else if (dev && dev_get_regmap(dev, NULL)) + hw->regmap = dev_get_regmap(dev, NULL);
Move "struct regmap *regmap" into struct clk_hw (since it's truly
reusable across clock types and is technically purely HW related) and
update it from the device's regmap like above.
We can then provide __clk_regmap_enable(regmap, offset, enable_mask)
helper functions. Then clock specific functions can use the helper. We
can even a simple macro to generate these wrappers.
#define DEFINE_REGMAP_EN_DIS(clktype) \
int clk_type##_enable(clktype *c, ....) { }
int clk_type##_disable(clktype *c, ....) { }
That to me seems like a reasonable compromise.
Thanks,
Saravana
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation